AI in Institutional Credit

AI consulting for credit and investment teams.

I build AI systems that encode credit domain expertise - domain-encoded agents, investment process architecture, and document intelligence - for buy-side credit funds, their LPs, and structured finance teams.

Built to surface source conflicts, underwriting gaps, and monitoring signals before they reach the investment committee or LP review.

A practitioner’s view, not a technology sales playbook.


deal_data_dictionary
What the read surfaces37 docs · 3 hrs
Source hierarchy
Material terms reconciled to the executed agreement, not the deck
Executed
Reconciliation
Term sheet and executed agreement disagree on the maturity date
Conflict
Underwriting gap
Advance rate sits outside the range for this asset class
Flag
Framing, not fact
“3 of 5 tenants investment grade” is a framing choice
Seller claim
What matters · what conflicts · what to check next
Surfaced what manual review missed3 days → 1 hour
Seventeen years in credit markets
RBC Capital Markets Bank of America Deutsche Bank
What I Build

Practitioner judgment, encoded into tools your team uses at the desk.

Not generic AI applied to finance. Systems built around how experienced credit professionals actually reason.

01

Domain-Encoded AI Agents

Covenant analysis, borrowing base review, deal screening, risk assessment. Practitioner judgment encoded into agents your team can use at the desk - not a general-purpose model pointed at credit.

02

Investment Process Architecture

Turning diligence, monitoring, and reporting workflows into sourced, repeatable systems that fit how credit teams already work.

03

Practitioner Advisory

A clear read on where AI creates real signal versus noise in your process. Workflow mapping, agent design, vendor evaluation - what to build, what to buy, what to avoid. I have sat on both sides.

Where this shows up

The workflows where domain knowledge is hardest to replicate.

iDeal screening & initial diligence
iiData room processing & extraction
iiiCovenant & indenture analysis
ivBorrowing base & collateral review
vPortfolio monitoring & reporting
viLP reporting & investor updates
viiMarket data integration & hygiene
viiiRisk assessment & stress testing
The Thesis

The bottleneck is not access to AI. Everyone has access. The bottleneck is that generic tools don’t know what matters, what to reconcile, or what to check next.

Generic AI
  • Can define a covenant - but not whether this one actually protects you
  • Doesn’t reliably know what matters, what to reconcile, or what to check next
  • Produces output that looks right - until a credit professional reads it
  • Every deal still requires a senior person to validate from scratch
Domain-Encoded AI
  • Reconciles the source hierarchy - executed documents override the deck
  • Identifies conflicts between documents - catches what fatigue misses
  • Knows what a credit professional checks next
  • Organizes output the way credit decisions actually get made
How engagements work

Start small, on a real problem, with no long-term obligation.

01

Scoping

A focused conversation to map where AI can actually help: what the bottlenecks are, where domain expertise is hardest to replicate, and what a useful output looks like for your team.

02

Proof of concept

Run a POC on a live deal or workflow. You see exactly what gets built and what the output looks like - before committing to anything broader. Scoped and priced separately.

03

Implementation

Build, refine, and hand off the workflow inside how the team already operates. Documentation and a handoff your team can use and extend independently.

In practice

What the work has looked like.

Representative engagement
Buy-side credit fund · anonymized
The input

A multi-tenant, multi-document data room - 37 documents spanning executed agreements, financials, and seller materials.

What it surfaced

A conflict between the term sheet and the executed agreement, and a structural term that warranted follow-up before IC review - details the team's initial review had missed.

What changed

A fully sourced diligence read in 3 hours instead of 3 days, organized by document tier and confidence, ready to take to the IC.

Initial screening compressed from days to hours, with a standardized extraction framework across a multi-site, multi-tenant portfolio - structured for LP reporting.

Credit fund · 2026 · anonymized

AI does not create credit judgment on its own. It magnifies what skilled managers already have.

The EigenStrategy thesis
About

Built from inside an investment process, by someone who lived it.

Prashant Radhakrishnan
headshot
prashant_headshot.png
Prashant Radhakrishnan
Founder, EigenStrategy

I spent seventeen years in credit markets, most recently as Managing Director and Head of High Yield Trading and E-Strategy for Leveraged Finance at RBC Capital Markets. I hold a graduate degree in computational finance from Carnegie Mellon, where my interest in applying mathematics to markets took shape.

What has always drawn me to credit is the pattern recognition - the connections between capital structures, the signals buried in document language, the way information moves unevenly across asset classes. I have managed traders, managed risk, and deployed real capital across market cycles.

These tools are designed from the inside of an investment process. The AI extends that experience. It does not substitute for it.

Managing Director, Head of HY Trading & E-StrategyLeveraged Finance
RBC
Credit Trading
Bank of America
Credit Trading
Deutsche Bank
MS, Computational Finance
Carnegie Mellon
Questions

What teams ask before we start.

Generic tools can summarize documents. They do not reliably know which terms matter, which source controls, what conflicts need escalation, or what a credit professional checks next. That judgment lives in people who have made credit decisions with real capital - and it exists in no training dataset.
It starts with a scoping conversation, usually 30 to 60 minutes, focused on a specific workflow pain point or deal type. From there I run a proof of concept on a live deal or data room so you can evaluate the actual output before committing to anything broader. POC work is scoped and priced separately. Most engagements that proceed move into an implementation or advisory phase, and ongoing relationships are typically structured as monthly retainers once the scope is defined.
Every engagement begins with a mutual NDA. I work exclusively with model configurations that do not train on client data and do not retain it beyond the engagement - a non-negotiable baseline for confidential deal materials. For teams with strict requirements, I can build inside your environment rather than routing documents through third-party platforms, scope access to the specific materials in play, and document data handling so it clears an information-security review. I have worked with pre-close investment data, names-based watchlists, and LP-facing reporting under confidentiality obligations throughout my career, and I am comfortable mapping the engagement to your existing vendor and access-control policies.
Yes, and that breadth is a meaningful part of what I bring. Seventeen years in public credit markets - high yield, investment grade crossover, leveraged loans - before private credit reshaped where capital flows. The most interesting analytical questions often sit at the intersection of both: relative value between a public bond and a private instrument on the same issuer, or what a public price signal says about stress building in a private portfolio. Private credit and direct lending are strong use cases on their own - large data rooms, dense documents, significant manual review burden.
The gap between generic AI tooling and the specialized analytical requirements of credit investment. Document-heavy workflows that consume disproportionate analyst time, the need to screen deals faster without sacrificing rigor, and the challenge of building AI that reflects how credit professionals actually think. Common entry points: data rooms that take days to process manually, covenant monitoring that still lives in spreadsheets, and watchlists that require synthesis across unstructured sources. Most clients arrive with one bottleneck and expand once they see what systematic document intelligence can do.
Get in touch

Send the workflow. I’ll tell you if AI can actually help.

Send a workflow or data-room bottleneck. I’ll tell you whether AI can help, what the first test should be, and where it is likely to fail. Most engagements start with a single scoping conversation - no long-term obligation.

Web
eigenstrategy.com